🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand defeat by Grimsby. Survive an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He could survive home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, an unwavering system, squandering the team's most promising academy products, the 32% win rate, labeling his team the worst in Manchester United history. But there was one adversary with whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to engage. You come at the sporting director, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning 1994-95 season, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have missed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a coach who often railed his squad for losing individual battles succumbing when confronted by the intense pressure and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

In truth, this whole bruising episode appears to portray the director in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been easy, given his nine months of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man who owed his position largely to his close relationship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any verifiable talent. How mistaken everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself as one of football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's mid-table rivals are now rightly wary.

The Strategic Conflict Over System & Philosophy

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist the coach originally, played a key role in attempting to convince Amorim to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. However, these judgements hold greater authority when delivered by a man of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, a veteran of three England caps and a contributor to a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning to the rest of us. Perhaps at some point questions may arise why Amorim is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. The director seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers in football – individuals such as him – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. Were he to speak, probably all we would hear is a series of ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his superior the billionaire owner, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. It is reported, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. The owner is eager for United to embrace data science and analytics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his minority ownership, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined by this group”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical football matters, leveraging his background in industry and sailing. Above all he remains incredibly rich, and as we all know, the wealthy are the best of us: more perceptive, sagacious, strategically brilliant, fundamentally superior. Whom else could one trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a new stadium that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Coaches

This is a trend we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels of the game. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to low-level employees such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously possible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and energy to join a club and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to decide the tactics by the directors and appoint someone who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they are now more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the food, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or leaks out of the box.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the public face for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and wins two medium-sized trophies, and effectively gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his reputation ruined whereas those individuals who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Game: Accountability for the Few

And possibly on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose mistakes can always be sacked away without explanation. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to fire them for playing too much 3-4-3. Bring in the process guy and later bin him for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for your modest increases in ticket costs, for the latest player acquisitions, for the fact that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.