🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the UK, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an celebration that started out as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between international African diaspora communities, has developed a corporate feel, growing to encompass functions where Black people are remunerated to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests sparked an increase in the enterprise of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the US and Canada in February, but also in October in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has developed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of transatlantic enslavement and fights for racial justice, and more on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with lectures and artistic activities. But the manner the observance is celebrated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month as much as the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of the racial justice movement, and we are in a situation where a member of parliament feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against DEI and affirmative action has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the state. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the historical documents is ongoing. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Against this backdrop, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be impactful if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she expressed apprehension about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The difficulty with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a challenging endeavor. There is a temptation to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, believing they are simply not fit for purpose, or are relics of an time that has not worked.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and yes, even those talks to businesses – constitute an framework that a lot of work has been invested in. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, regresses), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out across all seasons (as various establishments are already beginning to do), elements of its material (particularly around notable African descendants) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is basic knowledge of the bygone era when it fails to address the current situation of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Institutions who observe it should not be reassured with the neutral terminology of implicit prejudice and awareness of subtle slights, but confronted with the threats that impact society if fight against prejudice is not taken seriously. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made current, pressing, and reactive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.